Archives

Community health

The village clinics were built with support from Plateau Perspectives, with co-funding from county health bureaus. Jiongqu village was the first community to request assistance, and together with local government they put forth a sound argument for the need of such construction and basic equipment (beyond the health training already provided). Their primary aim was to establish good quality health facilities that were more easily accessible to the remote community, whose members could not at that time easily travel the long distance (over 200 km) to the county town. It also aimed to be a centre from which acute care services could be provided, and through which the government could make health insurance available for the rural Tibetan community. The administration of immunization programs also would be facilitated through construction of such a village clinic. After its construction, Jiongqu clinic was staffed by a Plateau Perspectives trainee and clinic governance lay with a village committee working together with the county health bureau. Overall, this clinic proved very successful. Following a similar model, other health centres also were built in the Sanjiangyuan region as requests were received from local herding communities and their situations confirmed by health bureau partners. In total, 9 village clinics were built (co-funded) by Plateau Perspectives in the Sanjiangyuan region, along with provision of furniture and equipment for two other clinics.

 

Worldviews and values

When such values are recognised and brought into conversations about environmental stewardship, they can strengthen collective action, broaden public engagement, and help foster more enduring, community-rooted approaches to protecting nature.

Everyone interprets and interacts with the natural world through particular lenses, whether consciously or not. Faith traditions and broader worldviews shape how people understand nature, value it, and act within it. Conservation is no exception. Despite its aspirations, it has often been guided by technical, financial, and state-centric approaches that overlook the moral, relational, and cultural dimensions of care. In response, it is important to work with people and communities whose perspectives foreground relational values, including faith actors, rather than viewing nature through instrumental or intrinsic value frames only. Further, such engagement should not be transactional. It calls for honesty, humility, and dialogue that supports mutual learning.

People of faith and local communities who live out their relational worldviews play a critical role in shaping the planet’s future. In a globalised world, where decisions made in one place will likely have far-reaching effects elsewhere, their contributions are more important than ever before. Yet, effective engagement and dialogue requires more than establishing communication channels; it involves recognising them as co-governance partners whose moral authority, social capital, and cosmological or theological understandings can strengthen and transform conservation practice.

Recent and ongoing activities and partnerships illustrate our engagement in this important area:

(1) Participation in panel discussion at the World Conservation Congress 2025, “The Missing Piece in Conservation? Engaging World Faiths and Worldviews at the Grassroots

–  Multi-speaker dialogue in the form of a panel discussion about faith and conservation, organised by Nicholas Warren (A Rocha International), Chantal Elkin (WWF-UK) and Bas Verschuuren (IUCN), and hosted by Judith Ochieng (A Rocha Kenya). Panellists included leaders from A Rocha International, WWF’s Beliefs & Values Programme, IUCN’s Specialist Group on Cultural and Spiritual Values of Protected Areas, Plateau Perspectives, the Islamic Foundation for Ecology and Environmental Sciences, and researchers of sacred natural sites; collectively bringing insights from Christian, Islamic, Buddhist, and Indigenous traditions.

–  Discussion underscored a common theme: conservation is a cultural and moral endeavour, not just an ecological one. A Rocha International reported “the session closed with a shared call for a new kind of collaboration, one that treats faith communities as equal partners and recognises that caring for nature is both a scientific and a moral responsibility” (a printable PDF version of this report is also available here).

–  For more information, see the IUCN CEESP Religion, Spirituality, Conservation and Climate Justice Specialist Group, as well as Guidance Notes on the Cultural and Spiritual Significance of Nature and a short film produced by IUCN CEESP and the Society for Conservation Biology.

(2) Practical scholarship on relational thinking (in collaboration with Dr Daniele Brombal, Lab on Area studies for Sustainability Transformations, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice)

–  Outcome of study retreat about anticipated impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative on social-ecological systems: The Cansiglio Declaration: Advancing a common ‘Charter of Values’ for the mutual benefit and well-being of living communities along the New Silk Roads (Brombal et al., 2019). Marco Polo Centre for Global Europe-Asia Connections.

–  Article on relational values in sustainability sciences: Thinking Like a Mountain: Exploring the Potential of Relational Approaches for Transformative Nature Conservation (Foggin et al., 2021).

–  Article about transforming EIAs to increase the voice and agency of local communities: Life Beyond the Checklist: Revitalizing the Potential of Environmental Impact Assessments Through Co-Creation (Brombal, Foggin, et al., 2025)

(3) Plateau Perspectives also partners with A Rocha International with whom it shares many values, especially a focus on investing in community—living in good relationship with God, one another, and wider creation. On this basis, we are delighted to announce that we have recently joined the Friends of A Rocha Network.

 

 

 

Walking with refugees

For example, individuals and families from mountain regions in Afghanistan have been forced to flee due to severe persecution—whether because of their ethnicity, their prior involvement with international organisations, or their creed. Some have faced direct threats, torture, and even targeted attacks such as the bombing of language schools they helped lead. In leaving their homes, they have also left behind their communities, livelihoods, and everything familiar, often crossing multiple borders and enduring years of uncertainty in precarious circumstances. Plateau Perspectives has in several instances accompanied and supported such displaced families, helping them navigate daily challenges while also assisting them in connecting with trusted sponsoring groups abroad. Through such partnership, families have been able to pursue formal resettlement processes and eventually have found safety and stability in countries such as Canada.

 

Myths vs Facts: Refugees and Asylum Seekers

Myth: “The UK is overwhelmed with asylum seekers.”
Fact: Refugees and asylum seekers together make up well under 1% of the UK population, and the UK receives fewer asylum applications per capita than many European countries.

Myth: “Most refugees go to rich countries like the UK and Canada.”
Fact: Around 75% of the world’s refugees live in low- and middle-income countries close to conflict zones.

Myth: “Asylum seekers come illegally.”
Fact: Seeking asylum is a lawful right under international law, regardless of how someone enters a country.

Myth: “Refugees are an economic burden.”
Fact: Long-term evidence shows refugees contribute significantly through work, business creation, and community involvement; Canada’s resettlement outcomes are especially strong.

Myth: “Most asylum seekers are not real refugees.”
Fact: Many Afghans and others fleeing across the region face well-documented persecution, threats, and targeted violence, leading to consistently high recognition rates in Western countries.

 

Policy Briefs series

Plateau Perspectives draws on more than two decades of work at the intersection of conservation and community development, combining field projects, academic research, and participation in multi-stakeholder development dialogues. This series shares key insights from that experience, with each issue highlighting established, emerging, or forward-looking themes in community-based conservation and sustainable development.

The first brief examined the intrinsic and practical value of biodiversity and the urgent need to protect nature as a foundation for human wellbeing. Subsequent briefs reviewed ecotourism as a tool for linking conservation with community benefits, introduced core challenges associated with globalisation, and explored expanding opportunities to apply educational technologies in support of sustainable mountain development.

The series focuses on mountain regions worldwide, with particular emphasis on greater Central Asia. Future issues will be released on an ad hoc basis, each contributing to a deeper understanding of development challenges and opportunities facing local communities and mountain social-ecological systems.

Four policy briefs are currently available:

       Biodiversity                Ecotourism                     Globalisation                     Educational Tech

Please contact us if you have any idea(s) you would like to discuss.